Wandering the spaces of the STOPGAME space station.ru and looking into various compartments I got to the blog reactor. There was a lot of doors. Some were familiar, others attracted unknown to themselves. And I decided to take a chance and go to the one on which the literature was written, because I have been ready for this for many years … since childhood I knew how to read.
But reading was one of the sides of this coin, it was more interesting to describe their impressions. And since the school years are already behind me, I will write my essay on the work of Stanislav Lem here! *Evil laughter*
So. Stop. How did you not hear about this? No, this is not another modern "writer". September 12 was generally 95 years old from his birth. That, even about "Solaris" did not hear!? Not surprising. I categorically honestly admit: if my beloved wife had not told me about his birthday – I would not have taken up the book that was dusting on the shelf. But the providence decided differently and I joined.
What, you are still interested in what kind of person is this? Even if not, I will take the courage to tell. Stanislav Lem is a simple Polish writer, Jewish origin, born in 1921 in the city of Lviv. And I, as a person not very knowledgeable in Polish science fiction, allow myself to call him Polish Strugatsky. I will make a reservation that I am familiar with the work of Strugatsky in a much larger volume than one story. Therefore, judge strictly, the main thing is that it is true. He, like the fantasy brothers, writes about space, the future and place of man in this future. But writes how much it looks like it is just as peculiar.
We will not find out anything about him, but maybe about ourselves
A striking example of his work is the notorious "Solaris". And what is this story about? This story about a lot. First of all, you need to figure out what this Solaris is and what is the conflict of everything that is happening? Solaris is a certain planet one day In a distant-distant galaxy, which is located in a system where two stars give light-red and blue “sun”, and the planet itself is filled with an ocean of unknown nature, on the surface of which strange formations are built. Studies of this planet gave rise to a whole science – solarism. And at the moment when the reader is involved in what is happening, this science, which is based on the faith that this ocean is a reasonable alien mind, is in decline. Hundreds of theories are compiled at the expense of the ocean and not one of them is true. The study of this cyclopic education is a stumbling block between the station employees. The first detective, then mystical, and then – a multipilos story, also unfolds.
Behind the high windows of the upper corridor, the sunset of exceptional beauty burned. It was not an ordinary, dull, swollen crimson, but all shades of blurred, as if sprinkled with the smallest silver of pink. The heavy, motionless ink of the endless plain of the ocean, it seemed, responding to this warm radiance, sparkled with a soft brown-violet gleam. Only at the very horizon did the sky stubbornly remained red.
This work makes you think about a lot, asks a lot of questions and does not even answer half of them. With all this, it remains suitable science fiction, in which many scientific aspects are explained with due care. Unfortunately, my knowledge in the exact sciences does not allow me to judge with confidence how much they correspond to reality.
Here to finish the https://thescorebetcasino.co.uk/ conversation about the book, summarizing – it is good, read if you do not have an allergy to this genre. But in our time, universal globalization, combination and interweaving of everything and everything, one cannot help but mention the art of cinematographic, which gave us two adaptations of this story.
People of great abilities and great character strength are born with a more or less constant frequency, but their choice of activity is not the same.
Solaris 1972 In general, everything will become clear, if we say that Andrei Tarkovsky performed the director here This is a masterpiece, diverging. The fact that Tarkovsky knows how to shoot science fiction, he will prove once again in 1979, when he makes the legendary film "Stalker". True, this genre is always very peculiar to him. Where, it would seem, technology, alien miracles and other unusual things should triumph, Andrei Arsenievich triumphs. In general, those who are familiar with his work do not need to talk about his author’s style, and those who are not familiar with words, you can’t explain in words – here you need to watch. The only thing that all his work sins is the protractedness of some moments and personnel, which may seem excessive and evasioning to many.
Solaris is a book because of which we quarreled with Tarkovsky. I spent six weeks in Moscow, while we argued about how to make a film, then called him a fool and went home … Tarkovsky in the film wanted to show that space is very disgusting and unpleasant, but on the ground – fine. But I wrote and thought quite the opposite ".
“I have very fundamental claims to this film adaptation. Firstly, I would like to see the planet Solaris, but, unfortunately, the director deprived me of this opportunity, as he shot a chamber film. And secondly (and I told Tarkovsky during one of the quarrels), he did not take off at all "Solaris", but "Crime and Punishment". Indeed, from the film it follows only that this pascular Kelvin brought poor Hari to suicide, and then for this reason was tormented by remorse, which intensified its appearance, and the appearance in the circumstances of the strange and incomprehensible. This phenomenon of the next appearance of Hari was used by me to implement a certain concept, which rises almost to Kant. After all, there is a Ding an sich, an unknowable thing, a thing in yourself, the second side, which is impossible to break through. And this in my prose was completely different and arranged … But it was completely terrible that Tarkovsky introduced Kelvin’s parents, and even some of his aunt. But first of all – mother, and “mother” is “Russia”, “homeland”, “earth”. This has already angry me decently. We were at that moment as two horses that pull one cart in different directions … In my book, the sphere of reasoning and issues of cognitive and epistemological, which is closely related to solaristic literature and the essence of the solarism, but, unfortunately, the film was thoroughly cleared of this was unusual. The fate of people at the station, about which we learn only in small episodes at the next collision of the camera-they are also not some kind of existential joke, but a big question regarding the place of man in the universe, and so on. Kelvin decides to stay on the planet without any hope, and Tarkovsky created a picture in which some kind of island appears, and a house on it. And when I hear about the house and the island, I almost get out of indignation. The emotional sauce in which Tarkovsky plunged my heroes, not to mention the fact that he completely amputated the "Saintist landscape" and introduced a lot of oddities, for me completely unbearable "
If you are not afraid of long films, see. And if you are afraid, try it too, suddenly you like it.
Solaris 2002 Here the situation is not so rainbow Soviet cinema is the best in the world, and American – pop. It would seem that the director is Stephen Soderberg, not the last person, the owner of an Oscar and the like regalia. And George Clooney is good here, plays like not in himself. But the essence of the film is strictly broken. If without spoilers, then all this turned into an ordinary melodrama with all the ensuing.
In the film, the heroes read an excerpt from the poem by Dilan Thomas "The end will come to the omnipotence of death".
The end will come to the omnipotence of death
Nagia dead will merge together
With an open wind, with the western moon,
When their gnawed bones disappear
And at hand and underfoot there will be stars,
They will go crazy, leaving their minds
Plunged into the abyss to rise again
Lovers will die, but not love itself
The end will come to the omnipotence of death.
And full -fledged original, for those who know the words overseas.
And Death Shall has no dominion.
Dead Mean Naked they Shall Be One
With the Man in the Wind and the West Moon;
Wen their bones are picked Clean and the Clean Bones Gone,
They Shall Havy Stars at Elbow and Foot;
Throw They Go Mad They Shall Be Sane,
Throw They Sink Through The Sea They Shall Rise Again;
Throwh Lovers Be Lost Love Shall Not;
And Death Shall has no dominion.
And Death Shall has no dominion.
Under the Windings of the Sea
They Lying Long Shall Not die Windily;
Twisting on Racks When Sinews Give Way,
Strapped to a Wheel, Yet They Shall Not Break;
Faith in Their Hands Shall Snap in Two,
And the Unicorn Evils Run Them Through;
Split All Ends Up the Shanat Crack;
And Death Shall has no dominion.
And Death Shall has no dominion.
No more May Gulls Cry at Their Ears
Or Waves Break Loud on the Seashores;
What Blew a Flower May a Flower No More
Lift Its Head to the Blows of the Rain;
Through They Be Mad and Dead as Nails,
Heads of the Characters Hammer Through Daisies;
Break in The Sun Till The Sun Breaks Down,
And Death Shall has no dominion.
Here. Whether you need it or not – decide for yourself. The film is not that bad, but it is common in the worst meanings of the word.
I hope I aroused at least a little interest in this work. So read good books, play good games, watch all the films in a row to argue with Dmitry Kungurov in the “dog handlers” and see you on the pages of Stopgame.ru, friends.